John Gruber had to write an AppleScript to ‘Save MarsEdit Document to Text File’. With Microbe, my 99% Gemini-generated first attempt to create a Micro.blog client in Emacs, this function came built in without my having to specify it. ⊕ Now, I am yet to add an actual Draft status to the Microbe posts. But since I post these as soon as I write them without much time left to simmer, for better or worse, this has not been a priority. Since the interface for composing posts is just another Emacs buffer you can save it as a text file as you would any other buffer: with a C-x C-s. Which is to say, Ctrl-x, then Ctrl-s. Emacs' propensity towards shortcuts extends to the text descriptions of the shortcuts themselves.

The functionality comes for free, but let’s face it Emacs is not the prettiest thing to look at right out of the box, and to my knowledge there is no way to beautify that toolbar. I had a feeling it was the antithesis to Gruber’s design sense, and that was indeed the case as far back as 2002 when he described it as being “at opposing end of the spectrum” from his favorite text editor, BBEdit. Of course, some implementations are worse than others. There was a positive mention, albeit inderectly, when Gruber quoted from an interview with Donald Knuth. In it, Knuth mentioned that:

I have special Emacs modes to help me classify all the tens of thousands of papers and notes in my files, and special Emacs keyboard shortcuts that make bookwriting a little bit like playing an organ.

This is the power of Emacs: to make you forget about its (lack of) interface because it is the Hole Hawg of text, all the more powerful now that generative AI can create custom modes in a blink. You will look at it in awe even as it leaves you dangling from a ladder.

• Sarah Perez for TechChrunch: Kagi brings its ‘small web’ of a human-only internet to mobile devices.

I have been on the Kagi family plan since January 2024 and can strongly endorse their search service. Only later did I discover that they had Serbian roots which oly made my endorsment stronger. ⊕ The company had at some point sent out free T-shirts to subscribers, featuring their delightful dog mascot. Being bright yellow, our daughter promptly stole it from me and started wearing it at school (another one she snatched was the yellow gold Hypercritical shirt, and I think there is a pattern there). One day at school when they were learning about globalization, their teacher had them look at their shirt labels. She was wearing the Kagi shirt, and to her surprise it said “Made in Serbia”, the village of Arilje to be exact. This bloog has been on their small web list for a while, but only since two days ago did I start noticing a double-digit influx of traffic. Welcome, all who stumble upon this writing.

• Gregory Meyer for the FT: Big bargains and ‘white knuckle’ buying: inside the rise of TJ Maxx.

TJ Max and Marshall’s are, next to Costco, the favorite stores of our family’s wise shopper. This article explains why, and the mastery of their buyers is reflected in the stock price. Also reflected in the price is the decline of Macy’s, which according to my wife exists only to satisfy the need of clueless international tourists to shop there based on branding alone — at least in their DC locations.

• M. John Harrison for The Guardian: The Delusions by Jenni Fagan review – an afterlife of queues and bureaucracy

This is the book he recommends, with an excerpt on Harrison’s blog. Yes, it is on the pile

• Nick Maggiulli: Why Private School Isn’t Worth the Cost.

Because people who can get it are connected enough and well-off enough that it doesn’t make an iota of difference, except in reducing the anxiety of their striving parents. You can guess, based on the tone, where our own kids go to school.

• Om Malik: Lobster Boil.

I could not care less about OpenClaw, but Malik’s whole article reeks of undisclosed LLM-generated text. Were those original algorithms over-trained on his writing? Wouldn’t be the first time that style got to me

• Richard Griffiths: Two Million Notes and No Dictionary: Learning from Semyon Vengerov’s Cautionary Tale.

“Russian bibliographer Semyon Vengerov (1855-1920) spent his life accumulating two million filing cards, but he died before he finished the dictionaries and bibliographies he set out to create.” Was it worth it? Well, had he completed his work maybe he would have been more known in Russia, but I doubt he would have inspired half as many blog posts. Here is to being a punch line.

🏀 This will not last.

🍿 Blue Moon (2025) was the perfect bottle movie, save for the gimmicky way in which Ethan Hawke was shortened by 10". Mandatory viewing for fans of Broadway musicals, words both spoken and written, and of E.B. White whose scenes I particularly enjoyed.

📚 Finished reading: Tools and Weapons by Brad Smith. An important topic — how do new technologies impact society and what can we do about it — covered in style so bland it makes corporate jargon stunning by comparison. That is what you get by being Microsoft’s General Counsel: a long list of people you would rather not offend, and an imperative to make your employer look good.

• Raghuveer Parthasarathy: Space mirrors, solar panels, fools, and their money.

A few months ago I noted that the one of the main reasons biotech was not like tech was its almost unlimited freedom do bullshit. Well, people are able to raise money by BS in other areas as well, as this article shows, but an order of magnitude less because most investors are able to do back of the envelope calculations.

• Bryan Vartabedian: The Measure of Everything.

A take on Goodhart’s Law as applied to medicine, this time through the lens of instrumentalisation. If any of these articles tickle you and you haven’t yet read Zen and the Art of Motorcyle Maintenance, please do so now. Ted Gioia recently wrote about the book and its legacy. As an occasional note-taker I am in the minority club of Lila fans as well, though both of Pirsig’s books are due for a re-read.

• James Olds: The Chronology Problem.

The point is in the subtitle: “how our bias towards recency in scientific discovery hurts our understanding”. It rings true, and even reminded me of the 26 years it took for CRISPR/Cas systems to travel the path from an oddity to a gene editing platform, until I realized that those 26 years were not spent idling as this review in Cell describes in detail. So, the (lack of) developments in theoretical biology would be a much better example.

• Phil Price: Ted Williams and Me.

Ted Williams was, apparently, a base-ball player about whom John Updike had this to say: “For me, Williams is the classic ballplayer of the game on a hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill.” This applies to any profession you can imagine, and indeed things outside of one’s professional life. People who have the inner drive to do things well even in the absence of stakes could unkindly be called “perfectionists”, but let’s remember that they are the ones who keep the wheels of civilization in motion, in opposition to the hordes of blankfaces, lazy asses and morons.

For the past three years I have been telling people that Clara Barton — known to you as the founder of American Red Cross, if you know about her at all — needs more screen time. This is not because she was a precocious introvert who learned to read at three, or because she practiced blood-letting via leaches on her reconvalescing older brother at age eleven, though I can to some extent relate to both. It is purely because, around the corner from our DC condo that bears her name, there is a museum that bears her name: the Clara Barton Missing Soliders Office Museum.

At its doorway is a replica of the Office’s original sign. As of this afternoon I own both a T-shirt and a magnet with this sign, because, well, just look at it.

Between the years 1865 and 1868, Ms. Barton used all her free time from the job in the US Patent Office as one of the first five female employees — and the first one paid the same as men — to help families of Civil War soliders find the fate of their loved ones, all 70,000+ of them who went missing, all having various degrees of literacy, before the phone, telegraph, or even indoor plumbing. The office was the nervous center of the operation that worked as a message exchange, and Barton was the center of the office which she loved so much, that she had her own bedroom narrowed so that the office could expand.

This is the first angle of the story: a procedural show with one main missing solider case per episode, several smaller ones in the background. Some of these could be played for comedic relief: not all soliders wanted to be found and the museum highlighted some interesting corespondence between Barton, a distressed family, and a man who wanted Barton to mind her own business and not have his name plastered all over pubic notice walls.

The second angle is Barton’s main employer, which is the US Patent Office which is just two blocks north and now houses our favorite Smithsonian museum ⊕ Or rather two museums, the National Portrait Gallery and the Museum of American Art. These are also not strangers to strong independent women. and which, from 1836 until 1877 housed tens of thousands of minitature models, one for each patent filed. Would Barton had known anyone there? Could any of the patent models have helped her crack a case? Is there a Q of the Bartonverse lurking somewhere in those Greek Revival halls? The mind tingles with the possibilities.

The third angle is the setting. This is Washington DC just after the Civil War. The only cobblestoned street is Pennsylvania Avenue, everything else is dirt central onto which throngs of people empty out their chamberpots while pretending to live in a civil society. This is Clara Barton on Christmas Eve — and the eve of her birthday — in 1861, as tens of thousands of Union Army recruits and ancillary war staff are pouring into town:

⊕ The quote, as seen in the Museum.

Our big city, grown up so strangely like a gourd all in a night; places which never before dreamed of being honored by an inhabitant save dogs, cats and rats, are converted into “elegantly furnished rooms for rent,” and people actually live in them with all the city airs of people really living in respectable houses, and I suspect many of them do not know that they are positively living in sheds, but we, who have become familiar with every old roof years agone, know perfectly well what shelters them.

An observation as valid today about a $4,000 per month row house in Adams Morgan as it was back then about a $7 per month boarding house room further downtown. I am not a fan of today’s issues creeping into (a)historical shows but this is the real deal: an expanding city with murderous architecture, as seen through the eyes of a whip-smart, energetic, ambitious woman.

Of course real life is so much more interesting than any procedural candyfloss could possibly contain. These were only three years in Barton’s life. Before that she created a public school out of nothing only for it to be taken from her and given to a male prinicpal; became one of the first women employees (but not before being fired from the job and then reinstated by Abraham Lincoln); tended to soliders and coordinated provision of medical supplies to such extent that she was called “the angel of the battle-field”; and seduced a (married) Lt Colonel who continued being so smithened by her that her photo graced the family mantelpiece upon his return. Burnt out after three years spent finding missing soldiers, she went to Europe to recuperate by doctors orders only to end up assisting civilians caught in the Franco-Prussian War and learn enough about the Geneva Convention and the International Committee of the Red Cross to prostelytize for both upon her return to America, picking up different causes well into her 80s. Exhausted just from typing this, I cannot imagine being the person who lived it. And I can’t wait to read about it in detail.

But wait, there is more. The whole Missing Soliders episode of Barton’s life was, well, missing from the records, and how we found out about it deserves a sub-plot of its own. As the Capital One Arena — back then the MCI Center — was being built, various speculators tried to cash in on the potential revitalization of the neighborhood. One of them was the United Stated government, who bought up almost an entire derelict block of warehouses and abandoned storefronts boredered by 6th, 7th, D and E street Northwest in order to flip them to developers. While inspecting one of those properties, a GSA employee called Richard Lyons found a treasure trove of Clara Barton artefacts and realized the building in which they were housed had to be protected.

⊕ An interview with Lyons is playing on loop in the Museum. In the HBO show he should be played by Bryan Canstron.

The problem was, he couldn’t just go to his employer and tell them that he shouldn’t be allowed to continue doing his job. At least he was sufficiently affraid of the federal government, back in 1996, to have to devise a different plan. He wrote a letter to the GDA under a pseudonym — Edward Shaw, the landlord — in which he implored them to look into the matter further. And they did! That and several surrounding buildings were reconstructed and preserved, and the office now houses the museum which is itself in care of the National Museum of Civil War Medicine whose wonderful staff provided most of the above information.

Still, it would be nice to have some other museum — looking at you, National Portrait Gallery — have a Clara Barton shelf. Tesla toiled in semi-obscurity for decades, and look at him now. Here is hoping for a similar Barton revival.

Proactive vs Reactive DDAVP: The Clamp Finally Faces an RCT from Joel Topf is a perfectly good hyponatremia article if you are into that sort of thing, but what got me interested was the preamble:

Note: This was one of my first posts on Roon.com If you are an American physician who likes to chat about medicine, you should sing up.

Roon.com is “a community for physicians to connect, share knowledge, and shape the future of medicine.” A walled garden for physicians? Made and funded mostly by ex-Pinterest people? Sign me up!