Posts in: tech

A brief Q&A:

A less hopeful harbinger of the future: someone in Serbia — most likely the government — seems to have used sonic weapons to disperse a 100K+ strong crowd of peaceful protestors. Here is a convincing audio analysis, and here are a few videos. Coming soon to a protest near you.

When Tim Berners-Lee has something to say about the future of social media I listen, even if it ends up being a pitch for his next two projects. They are Solid, a standard of data sharing across platforms, and Inrupt, a “data wallet” built on top of Solid. Godspeed, and may he avoid xkcd #927.

Here is a great quote on leadership in John Gruber’s pre-post-mortem of Apple Intelligence:

The fiasco here is not that Apple is late on AI. It’s also not that they had to announce an embarrassing delay on promised features last week. Those are problems, not fiascos, and problems happen. They’re inevitable. Leaders prove their mettle and create their legacies not by how they deal with successes but by how they deal with — how they acknowledge, understand, adapt, and solve — problems. The fiasco is that Apple pitched a story that wasn’t true, one that some people within the company surely understood wasn’t true, and they set a course based on that.

“Leadership” is a suitcase word and although I disagree with most of the concepts packed into it, maybe it has not become completely useless.

Some pre-weekend reading:

📚 Finished reading: Wittgenstein’s Poker by David Edmonds. Learned much about Wittgenstein and even more about Popper. Both were wrong, as all philosophers are, but I can’t help thinking Wittgenstein was more wrong than Popper, being so obsessed with language which — turns out — is merely the most superficial layer of human intelligence and one that’s fairly easy to emulate. I do wonder what “little Luki” would have made of LLMs.

As I pass the Microsoft Authenticator matryoshka doll gauntlet of one number matching push notification after another, the immortal words of Arthur C. Clarke come to mind: Any sufficiently thoughtless technology is indistinguishable from torture.

Also on that other site: Grok 3. I wish I could say it was pure hype and bragging from a man-child in need of attention. Alas it’s the real deal: it gave me less BS, and faster, to my now standard set of querries. Brave new world, etc.

Deep Research continues to impress: here is a 4000-word essay on how the word “Pumpaj” — Serbian for “Pump!” — became the slogan of the 2024/25 protests. Even the prompt was LLM-engineered, as described in this Reddit post. So it goes…

It isn’t only grad students who should be worried about Deep Research:

Students cannot be expected to continue paying for information transfer that AGI provides freely. Instead, they will pay to learn from faculty whose expertise surpasses AI, offering mentorship, inspiration, and meaningful access to AGI-era careers and networks. Universities that cannot deliver this specific value will not survive. This isn’t a mere transformation but a brutal winnowing—most institutions will fail, and those that remain will be unrecognizable by today’s standards.

Yikes! This is from Hollis Robbins, much more in-depth and thought out than my rapid review, though I take issue with her sticking the G in between the A and the I, because we are no there yet. (ᔥTyler Cown)